Powered by Outside

Review: Canyon Lux Trail - Mellow Marathon Machine

Jul 1, 2024
by Dario DiGiulio  
We last touched on the Canyon Lux Trail our Downcountry Field Test, where it didn't fare as well as the competition. Held back by compromised geometry and a more XC-focused spec than others in the category, it irked some testers in the group. Canyon seems to have taken that feedback to heart, with the new Lux Trail sporting a host of changes that seem to address some of those problems. With revised sizing, kinematic, and categorization, the Lux feels a bit more at home in its skin. The focus still feels decisively bent towards efficiency and speed, but read on to see just how things shook out.
Lux Trail Details
• Carbon frame
• 29" wheels
• 115mm travel, 120mm fork
• 67° head angle
• 76° seat angle
• 412-500mm reach, 480mm size L
• 435mm chainstay length
• Measured weight: 28.5 lb / 12.9 kg
• US Price: $3,599 - $6,199 USD
canyon.com

Canyon Lux Trail review



bigquotesIt feels like a bike made for very long days in the saddle, covering as much ground as possible at a quick clip. While you might have to skirt around some of the gnarlier features and trails, you'll probably make up for it when you're pinned on the road transfers.Dario DiGiulio




Canyon Lux Trail review

Frame Details

Canyon took the opportunity presented by reworking the Lux Trail's front triangle and really ran with it. The level of integration here is impressive, with in-frame storage, a hard-mounted multitool, and two water bottles to boot. The bike feels like it's been accessorized with long days in mind, and the quick-access tools and stashes make for a speedy fix should something go awry.

There are two frame trims to choose from, with the differences essentially coming down to weight. For an average size Medium frame, the CF models are claimed to weigh 2101 grams, with the more expensive CFR frames clocking in at 1936 grams. With equivalently light parts kits fit to each, there will definitely be some weight-weenie friendly builds in there.

The Lux now features a UDH rear end, making all your hard-shifting Transmission dreams come true. Front and rear lockout mean you can turn your mountain bike into a road bike at a moment's notice, and might make some post-ride pumptrack sessions more fun.

Canyon Lux Trail review
Canyon Lux Trail review
Quickdraw CO2 holster.
Canyon Lux Trail review
Quite a bit of cargo capacity down there.
Canyon Lux Trail review

While the improvements are many and welcomed, there are still some vestiges of the compromised designs of prior generations still at play here. The main two that come to mind are the flat-mount rear brake (this is for road bikes, please keep it out of the MTB world), and our favorite enemy, the through-headset cable routing. Both details make for a bike that requires specialized components that usually don't perform at the level of equivalently light or convenient designs.

Canyon Lux Trail review

Geometry & Sizing

In the name of keeping things quick (a theme with this bike), here are the beats: the seat tube angle is 1.5° steeper, landing at 76° across all sizes. The head tube angle of 67° is half a degree slacker than the prior generation, while the reach, stack, bottom bracket drop, and chainstay length remain essentially unchanged. This addresses a primary complaint about the prior gen bike, which was just how stretched out the seated position was, given the relatively long reach and slack seat tube angle.

The new Lux Trail's numbers are more in line with typical trail bike sizing, giving it both a more comfortable climbing position and confidant descending geometry. I've been riding a size Large, and found the seated position quite comfortable. The stock handlebar is a bit flat for my taste, but a little rise improved the ride quite a lot.

Canyon Lux Trail review


Suspension Design

The Lux Trail retains the linkage-driven single pivot layout of the prior model, but implements a hanging rocker meant to improve the small-bump performance. The 115mm of rear suspension is much more progressive than the Lux World Cup, with a left-hand lockout setup that allows for quick changes in suspension characteristic. The Open mode is full fat, letting things move as much as your setup allows for; Pedal mode firms things up, and holds the suspension higher in travel; Locked means locked, expect no movement.

Canyon Lux Trail review
Behold, chart.



Specifications
Release Date 2023
Price $6199
Travel 115mm
Rear Shock RockShox SIDLuxe Select+ Remote, 210x50mm
Fork RockShox SID Select+ Remote, 120mm
Headset Canyon Integrated
Cassette SRAM GX T-Type
Crankarms SRAM GX T-Type
Chainguide Canyon Integrated
Bottom Bracket SRAM DUB
Pedals N/A
Rear Derailleur SRAM GX T-Type
Chain SRAM GX T-Type
Front Derailleur N/A
Shifter Pods SRAM GX T-Type
Handlebar Race Face Ride, 760mm, 10mm rise
Stem Race Face Ride, 35mm clamp, 50mm length
Grips SRAM TwistLoc Ultimate
Brakes SRAM Level Silver Stealth, 4p front 2p rear
Wheelset DT Swiss XRC 1501 Spline S12
Hubs DT Swiss 240 EXP
Spokes DT Swiss Competition, straight pull
Rim DT Swiss XRC 1501
Tires Maxxis Rekon / Rekon Race 3C EXO 2.4"
Seat Ergon SM10 Pro
Seatpost RockShox Reverb AXS, 31.6mm, 100-150m



photo

photo









Test Bike Setup

The highly integrated nature of the Lux frame leads to a bike that feels like more of a single unit than an assembly of parts. Obviously all the same rules of bike setup still apply, but the Canyon shows up pretty close to ready to ride out of the box, in an attempt to make that user experience a little bit easier. It helps that many of the components on this build are familiar, so there was a little less to dial in over time.

The Maxxis EXO tires with low-profile Rekon and Rekon Race treads work best at lower pressures - 22 front and 23 rear felt optimal to me. You're less liable to peel a tire on a little bike like this, plus the added grip pays dividends on tricky terrain where the geometry might not be helping out too much.

The one component I swapped out for a long period was the stock handlebar, which felt too low and narrow for me. 760mm is manageable, but the 10mm rise wasn't my cup of tea - I added 20mm to that and things felt more balanced.


Dario DiGiulio
Dario DiGiulio
Location: Bellingham, WA, USA
Height: 6'3" / 191cm
Inseam: 34" / 86cm
Weight: 185 lbs / 81.6 kg
Industry affiliations / sponsors: None
Instagram: @danger_dario


Testing Info

This bike feels particularly well suited to backcountry exploration, where distance and scenery take precedent over burliness of terrain. The suspension lockout and climbing geometry mean you'll be comfortable in the saddle for a long day out, and the many on/in bike conveniences mean you'll be well provisioned for any mishaps far from the trailhead. There are many routes that fit this bill, but this one came to mind as a good use of a bike happy to put in the miles to get somewhere beautiful.

Canyon Lux Trail review


Climbing

The Canyon Lux Trail is a cross-country bike, no matter what the marketing lingo may lead you to believe. To me, this is a point of pride, not a demerit, as the speed an XC bike can carry on climbs and flat sections of trail is second to none. While the total weight of this bike may be a few pounds over race-focused XC machines, you hardly notice on long days in the saddle. The pedaling platform feels consistently supportive and energetic, especially with the added efficiency from the 3-position lockouts on the fork and shock. I found myself in Pedal mode the most, splitting the middle between a more traction-rich Open and the completely rigid Lock.

Pedaling the bike in Open mode is far from frustrating, as the kinematic seems to keep things from bobbing too much under power, while still keeping decent grip at the rear wheel. By no means is it the stickiest short travel bike I've ridden of late, but there's enough traction to keep you from burning out any time you leave the saddle.

The Lux Trail feels particularly well-suited to seated pedals over mellow gradients, where climbs come gradually and overall speed is rather high. The low front end keeps you in an aggressive position (and a rather uncomfortable one, unless you're used to the more road-style fit), and the 76° seat angle puts you in a nice spot above the pedals. With a higher rise bar installed, overall pedaling comfort increased for me, but your mileage may vary.

With the bike in Lock mode, the bike feels more than ready for some mad-dash sprints on pavement, or pinner climbs up very smooth paths. Ultimately it's a bit of an extra third mode, unless your rides regularly contain long stretches of smooth paved pedaling.
Canyon Lux Trail review


Descending
The climbing performance of a bike doesn't have to come at the expense of descending prowess, but it seems that somewhere along the way here sacrificed capability in service of efficiency. The Lux Trail is quick to remind you that it's an XC bike in all the ways you'd hope to forget, with touchy steering and a nervous feeling over technical sections of trail. You can get down some decently challenging bits of trail, but you have to do so carefully and more slowly than you might like. Flat, somewhat rough sections feel quite good, on the other hand, thanks to suspension that happily moves through the middle of travel to keep the wheels from getting too hung up on obstacles.

The wheelbase of the Lux is quite short, making it feel plenty agile when you're trying to hook the bike through squiggly turns and tight sections of trail. The downside is overall stability is rather low, compared to other new-age XC bikes that are starting to rake the front out to near trail bike figures. If you're in pursuit of a more traditional feeling XC bike, with some added comfort from an increase in travel, then I think this could easily fit the bill.

Canyon Lux Trail review

The fairly steep 67° head angle corners nicely on smooth trails and flatter turns, but can quickly become a hazard if you're putting the fork deep into travel while trying to negotiate the bike. Anything too technical can overwhelm that delicate composure and have you looking for a safer line to veer towards, though the brakes might not slow you down enough to get there. I'll touch on it further in the Technical Report, but the Level 2-piston brakes are a poor match to a bike that could otherwise be a fast and efficient off-road traveler.

When things line up nicely and you start to push the Lux Trail into some heavier compressions, the rear suspension does a solid job of keeping you from slamming into the bottom of travel, though the huge bottom-out bumper in the SIDLuxe shock is probably partly to thank for that. When the brakes are biting as well as they can, the bike does give a good amount of rear-wheel traction, allowing you to cut speed without blowing through the minimal tire tread out back. The bike has a tendency to pitch forward under heavy braking in steeper terrain, but ultimately it feels like the Lux Trail is meant more for carrying speed through rough sections rather than navigating steeps.



Canyon Lux Trail review
Canyon Lux Trail
Canyon Lux Trail review
Specialized Epic 8

How does it compare?

These two XC machines are currently in my regular rotation, and both represent a modern take on the genre, so it felt worth comparing them while fresh on my mind.

Put simply, the Epic blows the Lux Trail out of the water when it comes to on-trail capability and well-roundedness. For traditional racing, both have their merits, though given the increasingly technical nature of XC courses I'd probably still err towards the Epic's more evolved geometry.

The Lux offers more creature comforts in the form of frame integrations, though the Epic's in-frame storage has a much larger opening and still allows for two water bottles. Climbing capabilities are similar between the two, with the Canyon erring a bit more on the side of efficiency and sacrificing a little grip at the rear wheel. For those looking solely to put long days in the saddle, where the technicality of the trails are incidental, the Canyon may be the better choice.

Finally there's the matter of price. Two of the Lux Trail's complete builds are less expensive than the standard Epic frameset, and the most expensive bike in the Lux lineup is essentially the same price as the S-Works frameset. In other words, the Epic is a very expensive bike, and the Lux is not. Performance might not be the same on the descents and tech climbs, but it's worth considering your use case before throwing down the cash.

Canyon Lux Trail review

Which Model is the Best Value?

Canyon's direct-to-consumer business model allows for some pretty staggering prices on complete bikes, and the Lux Trail is no exception. Nothing on this list is dirt cheap, but when you consider the quality of the components hung on the frame, the aftermarket cost starts to get a bit daunting. My pick for value would be the CF8 model, sporting a Shimano XT drivetrain and brakes, Fox Performance Elite suspension, and DT Swiss carbon wheels. All for $4,999 USD (currently on sale for $500 less), you get a swath of some of the best components for the category.

Canyon Lux Trail review

Technical Report

RockShox 3P TwistLoc: The cockpit cleanliness of this system when used in tandem with the AXS dropper is impressive, keeping things tidy and tucked away. That said, I can't help but wish that it could be done with a standard lever arrangement, so you could run standard grips and toggle the lockout with a quick jab of the thumb. Minor difference in the scheme of things, but I think some users would appreciate the option. Luckily, the TwistLoc function is consistent and unobtrusive for my hand size and position, it just took some getting used to the slide-on grips.

SRAM Level Silver 2-Piston Brakes: While the 4-piston Levels feel appropriate for XC bikes, the 2-piston variants feel pretty awful regardless of the context. Part of this falls on Canyon for deciding to keep the flat mount rear brake standard on this bike - despite the fact that flat mount has no place in the mountain bike world - but SRAM didn't really run with the prompt either. The brakes feel underpowered and slow to bite, and the 160mm rear rotor doesn't help matters much. Metallic pads (same shape as SRAM Red road brakes) marginally help the situation, but not enough to justify the choice.

RaceFace 35 Handlebars: These are the only other spec dud, though the frustration is far less potent than with the Level 2P brakes. For a bike focused on weight, efficiency, and all day comfort, a handlebar seemingly made of solid aluminum bar stock feels a bit out of place. The weight of these is impressive, and translates directly into a jarring feeling when compared to just about anything else I swapped in. I ended up running a carbon riser bar for a while, mostly for fit reasons, but dropping a significant bit of weight helps as well.

Canyon Lux Trail review



Pros

+ Efficient and comfortable pedal platform
+ Good geometry for mellow pursuits
+ Clever, well-integrated frame details


Cons

- Poor performance in technical terrain
- Size-specific rear center would be nice



Pinkbike's Take

bigquotesIf you're in pursuit of a more traditional feeling XC bike, with some added comfort from an increase in travel, then I think this could easily fit the bill. What the Lux lacks in downhill capability is somewhat made up for in pedaling efficiency and amenities for a long day out, making it a solid choice for someone who wants a comfortable cruiser to explore mellow terrain. Dario DiGiulio






Author Info:
dariodigiulio avatar

Member since Dec 25, 2016
207 articles

96 Comments
  • 84 2
 The Epic wins not on the basis of an additional 0.6 degrees of slackness, but on having infinitely less headset cable routing.
  • 3 1
 Point well made, but Epic still has the option of headset routing - so perhaps not *infinitely* less.
  • 3 0
 Only if you are super rich and buy an SW.
  • 14 0
 @Bluefire: TBH I think the fairer comparison might be the Chisel FS, lines right up in the ~$3500, ~28lb xc+ range
  • 2 0
 And I'm guessing the headset cable routing prevents throwing in an AngleSet/etc. and trying to gain back some of that slackness...??

Unless you go with external cables and duct tape? Smile
  • 1 0
 Both.
  • 4 6
 @jsobrie: stop spreading this nonsense about chisel fs being 28lbs, despite of what specialized claim or Kaz claimed in that useless review (which was an deceiving ad).. i have chisel HT, which is nearly 28 pounds.. no dropper, no shock, no pivots obviously.. and yall dreaming for FS version to weigh the same
  • 2 0
 @GZMS: It's pretty easy to build a Chisel HT under 26lbs with a dropper, 28 seems doable for the FS.
  • 1 2
 @Genewich: it is easy to build this canyon sub 22lb.. whats the point of your hypotheticals? This discussion is about the bike as sold by the manufacturer for ~3500 usd.
  • 2 0
 @GZMS: You claimed a Chisel FS weighing 28lbs was nonsense. I think it's easily possible with the build kit on the $3500 bike, given that my very real and not hypothetical Chisel HT has a similar build at 26lbs. That's the point.
  • 45 1
 Not sure what Dario did to make Brian Park mad, but it seems like he is being forced to review some version of the Lux every 6 months
  • 18 0
 He went to Taipei with Prince's wardrobe...bound to make anybody jealous.
  • 36 1
 Headset routed? All other details is not relevant, can journalists stop reviewing bikes with headset routed so that manufacturers stop making them?
  • 5 7
 Canyon pays them too much money for them to refuse
  • 8 2
 that is unfair, but giving them shit everytime for it would be a good compromise, at least it should be mentioned on the negatives instead of "Size-specific rear center would be nice" which matters way less
  • 9 2
 You should be happy you have cables to route!!! Pretty soon everything is going to be wireless, and you'll have a monthly subscription fee to access your brakes.
  • 4 0
 @blcpdx: well u we’re right, new S nailed it
  • 16 0
 28.5lbs makes me doubt that claimed frame weight. Sure t type and the reverb axs are heavy but a lot of light parts on that bike too.
  • 4 0
 The frame (including the shock and all the hardware) must be super heavy, weighing at least 2500 grams or more.
  • 7 0
 For real. This thing is somehow heavier than my Stumpjumper even though it's shorter travel, steeper geo, shorter wheelbase, less convenient frame storage, and the complication of a flat mount rear brake and headset cable routing.
  • 10 1
 Yeah, my Spur with a Pike weighs' less than this and doesn't have to"skirt around some of the gnarlier features and trails"
  • 4 0
 I have a previous model (2021) and it is 10.9kg in size L (I swapped the 35 mm aluminium handlebar to a 31.8 carbon otherwise it is stock). The new one are surprisingly heavier despite carbon wheels and high end coz.
  • 1 0
 I'm skeptical too.

A bunch of people were just getting excited about the Cervelo ZFS-5 (basically a rebranded Blur) when they went on sale. They reported that the longer-travel 120mm / 115mm version with a stock GX builds were coming in at 25lbs.

A very-similar bike in the same category that weighs ~3 more lbs seems like a big downside.
  • 5 0
 28.5 lbs!. I'd rather a better fork and a cheaper drivetrain. Transmission is a significant weight penalty.
  • 2 0
 @Joecx: Yes, same for my Element/Pike combo. Either of those two set-ups crush the Lux on all but the tamest trails, and can still manage XC race duty anywhere but Saskatchewan or Florida.
  • 5 2
 28.5 lb for a short travel down-country bike is way too heavy and compromised. There are many other bikes to pick...
  • 3 0
 @Joecx: Same with my bc40!!..
  • 2 0
 This makes you wonder what canyon did to make a bike worse to ride and weighting 1-2kgmore than all their competitors. Even more when canyon is known to have bike build too light for their purpose with tiny pivots and tiny bearings which needs crazy amount of maintenance.
  • 11 0
 Canyon's pricing and spec are great, but their support is lackluster. I have a 10 month old Neuron CF that lost a pivot bolt. I check all bolts every few rides. Nevertheless I lost a pivot bolt and they have no time frame for when they will be back in stock. $5k+ bike is now hanging in the shed indefinitely. The same thing happened to a friend's neuron and the stays needed to be replaced. Again, the pricing is great, but the support this far has been very disappointing.
  • 5 0
 I've heard similar stories about Canyon and its always a bummer to hear. Seems like a lot of brands don't stock up like they should on essential parts.
  • 4 0
 Not sure how unique your bolt is, but it would be worth checking your local specialty fastener store to see if you can't find something that will work. When this happened to me several years ago, I was able to find a replacement just at home depot
  • 2 0
 @dwbaillar: Yup, I can vouch for this. Accidentally over-torqued a shock mount bolt on my Spur because of a broken torque wrench but managed to find something in the local hardware store to keep me riding until the proper replacement ordered direct from Transition turned up.
  • 3 0
 I have a Canyon road bike that is awesome and has been trouble free for 7 years.....however, I live 2 blocks from the US office and cannot get a replacement headset top cap, resorted to 3D printing it. FYI I did need to replace the headset bearings (sea air/humidity) and they were easily available from amazon at $15.00 versus the $70.00 plus shipping from Germany ACROS ones.
  • 3 0
 @dwbaillar: I've tried with no luck, unfortunately, It's a large bolt (m12) with a very fine thread. I'll keep looking, though!
  • 12 2
 These geometry numbers would be standard fare for bikes on EWS courses less than a decade ago -- I'm thinking of the 2016 specialized Enduro, or the over-forked stumpys used until 2018. But I guess now they're "twitchy" and "steep" for an XC bike?

I know everything is relative, nor am I saying this take is wrong necessarily. But still!
  • 12 1
 What shorts are those? Always on the lookout for MTB shorts that aren't loose like sleeve of wizard
  • 10 2
 6'3"...not on XL??
  • 4 3
 Exactly. Running too small of a size will make any bike 'twitchy', and not just to people used to bikes made for PNW terrain.
  • 2 0
 Considering he has ridden and reviewed other bikes and found reach in the range of 480-485 comfortable to ride I think a Large is fine here.
  • 4 0
 to be fair: Dario should be on a size L according to the Canyon size chart. I am the exact same height and would go for the L too, probably. The XL has a very long effective top tube which is not ideal for long days in the saddle. Plus, a 480 reach on a rather XCish bike is not the same as a 480 reach on an enduro bike, so in this case I agree with the sizing choice
  • 2 0
 @hardtailpunter: good points well made
  • 1 1
 @hardtailpunter: but the Epic 8 he tested was XL with similar reach/stack values to Canyon Lux Trail XL: www.pinkbike.com/u/dariodigiulio/blog/review-2024-specialized-epic-8-free-speed.html
  • 1 0
 @otoko: got to go with the manufacturers recommendations
  • 1 0
 @Tambo: not always the wisest thing to do

In my situation I'm exactly same measures as the author (191/86) and right between L and XL for Canyon Lux Trail or in XL for Specialized Epic 8 or Cannondale Scalpel (Scalpel has even longer reach).

As I was reading through the article I've remembered my own mistake of downsizing in the past, same symptoms - need to create more room in cockpit and significantly rise handlebars. Also very nervous on technical stuff going downhill.

Wrong frame size. Too small.

Would be great to see a retest with XL.

PS. Need to also consider change in saddle position. 76 degree angle will force you forward and without enough reach you will find yourself cramped, bike will feel small even with relatively big reach.

Initially I had same thoughts that XL will be too much but after I have done some modelling I came to conclusion that L would be too small for me. Not enough room.
  • 1 0
 @otoko: yes but a review has to - as far as possible - test what the manufacturer offers the public. They can only assume that the recommended size is what makes the bike ride the intended way, and the joke is on the manufacturer if that results in a poor review
  • 6 4
 Honest question from an ignorant person. If you want a bike like this, wouldn't a 130mm or bigger trail bike with light tyres and light parts weigh only a bit more and perform better? I know this is for Olympics, but it's a big market for something that seems flawed in nature.
  • 7 3
 I am too old to do jumps, I just ride a few trails and forest roads. I built myself a fully rigid 29er bike, and it works. But for the trails with roots and rocks, some suspension would be nice. Because I'm old, I don't want to sit stretched out on a cross country race bike. Why would I need 130 and an extra two kilos for forces I do not put into the bike? I suspect a 100 mm light bike with more comfortable seating position would be the choice for my peer group.
  • 21 0
 I am not a bike reviewer so I don't really have the vocabulary to explain this, but there's just something about an actual XC bike that a 130mm trail bike can't match. Pedaling performance is insane, and with even a modicum of fitness you can breeze to the top of a mountain without thinking. The good ones are more than capable of riding most trails in most places. They even make some trails more fun. Unless you're hucking everything to flat, being overbiked on mellow trails can feel dead and boring. Riding that same trail on a 110 XC bike adds a snap and lively feeling. Plus if you do any actual racing, you'll quickly see the difference between a 130 trail bike and a proper XC bike. They just want to motor.
  • 4 0
 @Austin014: Agreed. I can’t put it into understandable words either, but you’re on to something with how these bikes feel when you’re pedaling. Granted, I’m not a rider who activity seeks out a ton of air-time or jumps, but I’ve tried twice to use a trailish bike as the OP suggested, and for me I’ve found I’m much better off (and happy) on a 130/120 DC bike. They fly around most green/blue trails, and the geo nowadays is good enough to keep me alive on must of the steep stuff I want to ride in my neck of the woods. For me, its been much for fruitful for me to ‘scale up’ my Rocky Element with bigger brakes and tires when needed than go the other way.

Now with all that said, I wouldn’t touch this Canyon with a 10 foot pole—the headset routing and flat mount make this bike a non-starter for me.
  • 4 0
 @Austin014: I think some of it comes from the more aggressive seated position. Being in more of a sprint-like posture makes it feel right to pedal hard, whereas a more upright, relaxed posture feels more right for taking it slow and easy.
  • 3 0
 @Austin014: very true ..But I feel I've come very close tossing a fox34 130 on my Allied bc40 and still keeping most of that light and snappy feeling.. Hell of a bike!
  • 2 0
 My Stumpjumper with a PIKE and 900g tires was 25.5 lbs so yep.
  • 4 0
 @padrefan1982: Same here. I have a 140/160 bike with 2018 geometry and then a BC40 120/120 with newer school geometry. Generally speaking I never want to ride my old bike anymore even when the trails get a bit bumpy and steep. At this point I usually ride the old bike as my "mud bike" when I just don't want to cover the BC40 in ick. Now the 140/160 bike is nice, and it's tons of fun and I get an appreciation for the cushion sometimes. But then the trails dry out and there's no way I don't grab the new bike.
  • 3 0
 @Austin014: This. I gave in to my curiosity and bought a epic evo last year, I unlocked so many PRs and some KOMS even. I think a lot of it had to do with the low rolling resistance of the XC tires on it though, I would have never guessed to go try some Maxxis Aspens on my Santa Cruz Hightower... which surprisingly work really well in the desert!
  • 11 0
 @devinkalt: I think alot of folks are over-tire'd. There is a place for some grip but not every weekend warrior needs DD Assagai's with inserts.
  • 1 0
 @yupstate: The BC40 is such a rad bike bike eh? Thing climbs better than my Sb130 LR ever did (which is obvious) but descends nearly just as well given the decrease in travel..
  • 2 0
 Am I doing something wrong or does the trailforks route embedded view not show enough data? I can't see distance, vert, etc. From hovering part of the route I can tell it seems to be called "Chuckanut Meander" but I can't find a way to open it in trailforks to look at it in more detail. I've noticed this on other articles as well.
  • 5 0
 Sorry you wasted your time Dario, but I read 'through the headset cable routing' and skipped the rest of the review.
  • 7 4
 I think the Specialized-Pictures beside the specs propably aren't what's supposed to be there @dariodigiulio
Thanks for the review Smile
  • 9 0
 A con for this bike - competitor bike photos show up in reviews.
  • 1 0
 @DaveRobinson81: Wink The photos in question have been updated since my comment (and can therefore no loger be seen)
  • 5 0
 Why the headset routing?

Its not like it's sitting in bike shops...
  • 4 2
 When almost every XC bike from Scott to Trek to Specialized to Santa Cruz to Yeti to Intense make lighter, better descending XC bikes, this one’s a straight up dud. Even on discount-a bad buy.
  • 1 0
 How is this 28.5 pounds? I've built up a Stumpjumper (140mm Front / 130mm Rear) with light XC wheels and tires that is 3 pounds lighter and I ride an XL. I don't do jumps and am very much an XC guy but I do plenty of rough trails.
  • 1 0
 I bought a Lux Trail CF8 during the memorial day sale but returned it because there was some wheel damage when it arrived. When I rode it the bike was actually very nice. The weight wasn't bad, its not an really XC bike, its a very short travel green / blue trail bike. Compared to my Stumpjumper Evo carbon frame, the Lux Trail frame was quite nice, and the Lux Trail weighed 6 lbs less. I did not buy a replacement because of the headset cable routing and because it was a little short for me, 5'8" riding a small Lux Trail and an S3 SJ Evo. Otherwise though, no real complaints about Canyon or the bike, other than the headset cable routing. Waiting for my BMC Fourstroke LT Two to arrive now, its a little long and slacker than the Lux Trail and none of the headset cable routing.
  • 3 0
 Looks like Canyon have made the best gravel bike currently available.
  • 1 2
 In some financial sense, speccing RaceFace 35 bars and trash brakes on a cheap bike just means the customer has more optionality to put something specific to their desires on the frame. Canyon doesn't do Orbea-level customization, but this might be the next best thing.

However, the frame doesn't seem sorted enough. What is it about the Epic that makes it so much more capable?
  • 1 0
 @dariodigiulio what xc shorts you rockin for this review? looks like some solid narrow fitting shorts, most shorts are too baggy for xc these days
  • 1 0
 Pretty sure those are the Canyon MTB Shorts. They're a little warm, but the fit and finish is great.
  • 14 16
 So, uhhh, did you actually circumnavigate Mt St Helens on this. I ask because a) you're not supposed to and b) that south section of the Loowit is a metric shit ton of hike a bike. How many cubic feet of pumice did you dump out of your shoes?
  • 3 0
 pretty sure Dario did the tour divide once, so I bet a little hike a bike ain’t no thang for the big man
  • 1 2
 If this is the case, that you’re not supposed to ride the full loop, then that makes me sad that Dario did what he did.
  • 2 0
 Pretty sure that he didn't do that loop on this bike - that map's been updated to something more appropriate for the Lux.
  • 3 0
 Review and written confession--will Forest Service prosecute? Nothing's for free. A ton of sand is about 22 cubic feet, but pumice is significantly less dense, so DD may have dumped 100 cubic feet of it from his shoes

Poor geometry at any price is poor geometry? Elephant (175 cubic feet) in headset? But top model is cheap--not as cheap as a Z9 without a lens cheap....

I did first section of this ride on a glorious summer day on a rented downsize 27.5/3.0". Plains of Abraham approved. Option to push up to restricted zone no.1 was not irresistible
  • 1 0
 @rickybobby19: For sure. It's just that here are section of the Loowit that where you're hopping from head-height boulder to boulder or pulling yourself up fixed ropes, and those are the bike-legal sections! (and there are of course some sections that are simply breath taking with scenery and wonderful to ride).
  • 3 0
 @ceecee: "will Forest Service prosecute?"

My guess is that they wouldn't. I've only ever seen the BLM go after someone, and that was because of trail vandalism, not poaching.

USFS, specifically MSH National Monument, absolutely would stop working with MTB groups to maintain the trails if they felt the community was not living up to the Monument's stewardship goals.

There's a big ride-campout-work party at MSH coming up August 16 - 18. If anyone is interested, shoot me message and I'll send you the info.
  • 1 11
flag ceecee (Jul 1, 2024 at 10:52) (Below Threshold)
 @pmhobson: map doesn't matter as long as it's from Tforks!

@mikekazimer: suck it
  • 2 0
 @ceecee: Not sure I follow you. What was posted earlier was a route on TF, not a ride log.

There absolutely is fantastic legal riding at Mt St Helens in general and the Loowit trail in particular. But some sections of the Loowit are off-limits to bikes.
  • 1 0
 @ceecee: I don’t understand. What’s the context around that trail that is germane to Mt St Helens?
  • 1 2
 I only use aluminium bars after a catastrophic snap of the bars a little over a decade ago. I think there is nothing wromng with the shape or size of this 35mm bar. I am confused knowing the tester like bury stuff.
  • 4 1
 35mm aluminum bars are very hard to get right. We have had two different ones that I couldn't ride more than a mile of trail without having bad wrist pain. Swapped to a Renthal and a 1Up and both have been perfect. I am with you on not riding carbon, but aluminum bars are much harder to get right.
  • 4 0
 I use 35mm or 31.8mm Renthal aluminum bars on most of my personal bikes, no knock on the category in general. These particular bars on this bike feel wholly wrong for the build, particularly in weight and comfort.
  • 1 0
 alloy bars do that too, not sure what is the point here, few years ago an alloy renthal completely snapped leaving a very sharp edge unlike a carbon one would at the EWS in Switzerland
  • 4 2
 I’d rather buy a chisel
  • 1 0
 Seriously, is there ANYONE in the general public that likes headset cable routing? Reason enough to make me look elsewhere.
  • 1 0
 He went to Taipei with Prince's wardrobe...bound to make anybody jealous.
  • 1 0
 XC helmet but no spandex? Dario! One side or the other Wink
  • 1 0
 @Tjmfc Naa that's that hybrid down country look now that is making its way into the new trend.
  • 1 1
 Did I just read it’s mostly, and almost only, good at road transfers?
  • 1 2
 So are we done with the DH bike field test?
  • 5 0
 Nope, there are a bunch more - those come out on Wednesdays.
  • 6 1
 No they are just releasing 1 review a week for some reason Frown
  • 4 5
 @Rigidjunkie: gotta dribble out the content to boost long term engagement and ultimately, share holder value. It would be fuduciarily neglegent not to.
  • 2 0
 @Rigidjunkie: cannot burp all the content at once







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.056984
Mobile Version of Website