DescendingThe climbing performance of a bike doesn't have to come at the expense of descending prowess, but it seems that somewhere along the way here sacrificed capability in service of efficiency. The Lux Trail is quick to remind you that it's an XC bike in all the ways you'd hope to forget, with touchy steering and a nervous feeling over technical sections of trail. You can get down some decently challenging bits of trail, but you have to do so carefully and more slowly than you might like. Flat, somewhat rough sections feel quite good, on the other hand, thanks to suspension that happily moves through the middle of travel to keep the wheels from getting too hung up on obstacles.
The wheelbase of the Lux is quite short, making it feel plenty agile when you're trying to hook the bike through squiggly turns and tight sections of trail. The downside is overall stability is rather low, compared to other new-age XC bikes that are starting to rake the front out to near trail bike figures. If you're in pursuit of a more traditional feeling XC bike, with some added comfort from an increase in travel, then I think this could easily fit the bill.
The fairly steep 67° head angle corners nicely on smooth trails and flatter turns, but can quickly become a hazard if you're putting the fork deep into travel while trying to negotiate the bike. Anything too technical can overwhelm that delicate composure and have you looking for a safer line to veer towards, though the brakes might not slow you down enough to get there. I'll touch on it further in the Technical Report, but the Level 2-piston brakes are a poor match to a bike that could otherwise be a fast and efficient off-road traveler.
When things line up nicely and you start to push the Lux Trail into some heavier compressions, the rear suspension does a solid job of keeping you from slamming into the bottom of travel, though the huge bottom-out bumper in the SIDLuxe shock is probably partly to thank for that. When the brakes are biting as well as they can, the bike does give a good amount of rear-wheel traction, allowing you to cut speed without blowing through the minimal tire tread out back. The bike has a tendency to pitch forward under heavy braking in steeper terrain, but ultimately it feels like the Lux Trail is meant more for carrying speed through rough sections rather than navigating steeps.
Unless you go with external cables and duct tape?
A bunch of people were just getting excited about the Cervelo ZFS-5 (basically a rebranded Blur) when they went on sale. They reported that the longer-travel 120mm / 115mm version with a stock GX builds were coming in at 25lbs.
A very-similar bike in the same category that weighs ~3 more lbs seems like a big downside.
I know everything is relative, nor am I saying this take is wrong necessarily. But still!
In my situation I'm exactly same measures as the author (191/86) and right between L and XL for Canyon Lux Trail or in XL for Specialized Epic 8 or Cannondale Scalpel (Scalpel has even longer reach).
As I was reading through the article I've remembered my own mistake of downsizing in the past, same symptoms - need to create more room in cockpit and significantly rise handlebars. Also very nervous on technical stuff going downhill.
Wrong frame size. Too small.
Would be great to see a retest with XL.
PS. Need to also consider change in saddle position. 76 degree angle will force you forward and without enough reach you will find yourself cramped, bike will feel small even with relatively big reach.
Initially I had same thoughts that XL will be too much but after I have done some modelling I came to conclusion that L would be too small for me. Not enough room.
Now with all that said, I wouldn’t touch this Canyon with a 10 foot pole—the headset routing and flat mount make this bike a non-starter for me.
Thanks for the review
Its not like it's sitting in bike shops...
However, the frame doesn't seem sorted enough. What is it about the Epic that makes it so much more capable?
Poor geometry at any price is poor geometry? Elephant (175 cubic feet) in headset? But top model is cheap--not as cheap as a Z9 without a lens cheap....
I did first section of this ride on a glorious summer day on a rented downsize 27.5/3.0". Plains of Abraham approved. Option to push up to restricted zone no.1 was not irresistible
My guess is that they wouldn't. I've only ever seen the BLM go after someone, and that was because of trail vandalism, not poaching.
USFS, specifically MSH National Monument, absolutely would stop working with MTB groups to maintain the trails if they felt the community was not living up to the Monument's stewardship goals.
There's a big ride-campout-work party at MSH coming up August 16 - 18. If anyone is interested, shoot me message and I'll send you the info.
@mikekazimer: suck it
There absolutely is fantastic legal riding at Mt St Helens in general and the Loowit trail in particular. But some sections of the Loowit are off-limits to bikes.