Descending In some ways, the Frameworks is a total brute with a strong, stiff frame that can plow through deteriorated tracks with the best of the high-pivot sluggers. Then again, when precision is needed, it doesn’t get bogged down by mega-slack angles or lethargic wheel paths.
The tall stack height and low center of gravity allow the rider to stand tall and ride relaxed, yet stay balanced with their weight placed equally on both wheels. There’s no need to move fore and aft to find grip from the tires when zipping through smooth berms. On top of that, there’s an impressive amount of grip produced by that progressive setting, however, your line choice may be limited as the cranks ride concerningly low to the ground. We struck the chainguide on multiple occasions without expecting to.
A hint of instability does come about when turning through rougher sections of trail though, in a way where the front wheel wanted to tuck. It’s a trait that we found in the YT to slightly display too and this could come from that square stance of the higher bar height and seemingly steeper head angle.
In steeper terrain, the Frameworks DH also gives that similar sense of your hands being directly above or even in front of the front axle and that can be slightly unnerving if you prefer a slacker ride. Some of that tense steering can be initiated from braking too. There’s more influence from those braking forces than bikes like the M1 which remains steadier and left us smirking through those steeper chutes.
Henry felt strongly about the frame being overly stiff, and while I agree that’s true compared to the other bikes on test, it didn’t transmit as much vibration through the frame like the YT Tues did. The reasoning could be split into two parts; the lateral forces that are taken up by the brilliant Enve Dark6 prototype wheels, and the chain damping components that soak up forces from the chain whipping about.
Matt's got so much insight into racing and I really appreciate his opinion, and I think Kaz is the best *writer* of bike reviews there is atm. But Henry you're doing a REALLY great job of being the personality of Pinkbike here, and taking over from Levy in that role. I started MTB and reading about MTB with Levy being that for Pinkbike, and I still really love and miss him for that/in that role. But you're doing at least as well - which is intended as higher praise than it might sound like haha!
Also shout out to Christina for always bringing the vibe, and would love to see something from Tom Bradshaw again too!
He’s in recent podcast, where he talks about the post pinkbike life, along with some other post punk bikers…
For example, I personally don't have a fox DHX or 40, so I don't know if it is 9 out of 10 clicks open, or 9 out of 18 open. One would be near wide open and the other mid range.
Thoughts @mattbeer?
Not really... I've had mine for 8 months, ride DH incessantly, and the thing is bloody flawless still!
P.S. You should probably do a bolt check when you put new things on your bike
Tried it in multiple settings.
Transition Patrol
The bolts were torqued, however the manufacturer's recommended 4nm is obviously not enough, and they probably know that which is why it has circlips on the back keeping the bolts from falling out entirely...
P.S. You should probably not assume that I did not check the bolts you dingus.
No. If you realy want to be picky, it should be as follows:
"Frameworks has selected the DHX platform, instead of the DHX2 which offers more external adjustability"
It is the DHX2 that offers more external adjustment, not the DHX.
-Sent from the top of the Pneuma climb at Moose Mountain AB
Get a lap in for me while you’re at it
Is it so hard to adjust frame tubing on newly developed product?
His middle name is "the"