Powered by Outside

Review: Ohlins TTX Air - Shock Week 2023

Aug 25, 2023
by Matt Beer  
photo


photo

Ohlins TTX Air 2



Identifiable by its Swedish gold, or yellow - whatever it is, Ohlins shocks are recognizable and well respected with a rich heritage in motor vehicle racing. When they first entered the mountain bike market, only coil shocks were produced. Demand for an air shock was met shortly after that focused on trail and enduro bike applications.

The TTX Air follows suit with the rest of Ohlins mountain bike shocks, which use a twin tube damping architecture to separate the oil flow into two directions, compression and rebound.
TTX Air 2 Details

• 2 air can sizes available
• 3-position HSC lever
• High-speed compression - 3 clicks
• Low-speed compression - 11 clicks
• Rebound - 12 clicks
• Weight: 519 grams
• Price: $780 USD
ohlins.com

This isn’t the first time we’ve covered the TTX Air 2 - Seb Stott published a detailed review and chat with Ohlins back in March, 2022. This time around, we’ve put it head-to-head against four other air shocks, all of which were mounted to the same bike, and scrutinized under multiple tech editors.


Setup

In order to deal with the variability of leverage curves amongst the bikes on the market, two air can sizes are available in the TTX, denoted by the number “1” and “2” in the shocks' nomenclature. Ohlins prescribed the TTX Air 2 with a lighter damping tune that was developed by their enduro racers. The TTX Air 2 features a larger positive and negative air volume, giving less progression than the TTX Air 1 for our Santa Cruz Nomad test sled.

Ohlins has a comprehensive Performance Suspension Guide and a bank of tunes available for popular bikes on the market, however, the online calculator might need to be updated since the Nomad V6 was not listed.

It’s worth pointing out that only the TTX Air shocks are not available in the common downhill bike length. Only the coil TTX models are produced in lengths greater than 230x65 or 205x65mm.

Ohlins says that this shock was designed around bikes that are meant to climb to the top of descents. Packaging the TTX Air into longer lengths would require a redesign

Installing the TTX Air 2 on the Nomad is a tight squeeze as the position of the air valve rides very close to the top of the shock tunnel, but there is sufficient clearance. Checking the sag, which was set to 30% (180 psi @ 78kg rider weight), is less taxing for this combination as the body is not impeded by the frame, like the DVO or Marzocchi.

Similarly, all of the damper adjustments are very accessible too, mind you, the rebound and LSC will require a 3mm allen key to turn. Those damper adjustments were turned 7 clicks from closed on the LSC, 5 or 6 out on the rebound dial, and the HSC lever was left in the fully open position for descending.

photo

photo
Ohlins prescribed the less progressive TTX Air 2 with larger positive and negative air chambers for the Santa Cruz Nomad V6.


Climbing

In the case of the TTX Air 2, there isn’t a “lockout” per se. Instead, a lever on the HSC offers three settings, in which the firmest position acts as a “climb mode”. Ohlins' theory on this is said to allow very low speed movements without totally blocking off all forces.

On the trail, that’s true too. Rather than turning into a solid brick, as the Vivid’s “Threshold” lever does, the TTX Air has a small amount of resistance that gives away when it encounters a bump. The shock remains firm enough to resist pushing deep into the travel yet doesn’t turn the bike into a hardtail either.

Reaching the lever is second nature due to its lateral axis and location on the forward mount. Unlike the Float X2 or Bomber Air, this switch has clicks that you know when you have moved out of the closed position.

photo
0% Loaded prev 1/5 next

photo
photo
Turning the lever clockwise closes off the bleed port, restricting the flow, and forcing the oil through the smallest port and into the shim stack.

Descending

Each suspension brand sent over their optimized shock for the Santa Cruz Nomad and Ohlins provided us with one of the lighter damping tunes that was developed in conjunction with their enduro athletes.

That was surprising to hear because the TTX Air required the most attention to ride. Control of the bike was high - in that the rear wheel tracked the ground impressively - but more effort was needed to work the bike through choppy root sections.

I experimented further with the TTX Air to try and recoup some comfort when I wasn’t totally engaged on the bike. Lowering the pressure by 3 psi helped to relax the shock just enough to bring back some cushion. In doing so, I began to reach the bottom of the travel on g-outs, such as abrupt rock rolls, that weren’t previously an issue. Adding a volume spacer didn’t win me over though, as the ramp up brought on too much force. I’d rather occasionally use up all 65mm of shock travel than hitting the progression ramp of decreased air volume frequently and so I reverted to the original setup.

This is where the extra feature, and weight, of the hydraulic bottom out can be the right card to play. There’s no doubt that Ohlins has developed a superb air shock, but for the price, you can find more adjustments on the RockShox Vivid.




Pros

+ Racer-like control
+ Two air can sizes available to suit different leverage curves
+ HSC lever offers a special blend of support and traction to climbing


Cons

- 3mm allen key required to adjust LSC and rebound - arguably the ones most frequently changed
- Required the most time to settle on a sweet spot
- Higher cost with less adjustments than Fox and RockShox options





Author Info:
mattbeer avatar

Member since Mar 16, 2001
384 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

104 Comments
  • 18 0
 As good a place as any to give the tip that the Ohlins online suspension calc is the best in the biz: www.ohlins.com/performance-suspension-guide
From my experience, it is the only one that takes into account the progression curve at all, let alone specific to bike models. This means it corrects for sag at the shock vs the wheel (30% at wheel will be less than 30% at shock with any progression), and it corrects for leverage ratio at your sag point (spring rate will need to be higher than average with any progression). Every other calculator I've used (TFTuned, EXT, Fox, SRAM...) underestimates spring rate pretty drastically.
  • 6 0
 That's really interesting, I never realized there's a difference between setting sag at the wheel vs shock.

Which one is recommended, and which one do manufacturers use when displaying their leverage curves with the sag point?
  • 9 1
 @boiancristoph: I hope manufacturers spec at shock because measuring wheel travel is pretty difficult
  • 10 0
 @mtmc99: dirtbikes are all measured at the wheel.
  • 18 0
 @boiancristoph: to my knowledge frame manufacturer recs are sag at wheel, but the most important thing is that you have a reference point for your own tuning. Given most bikes are consistently about 20% progression +/- 5%, you can usually just assume wheel travel is gonna be a ~3% nominal less than wheel at sag. So if your target is 30% wheel sag, aim for 27% shock sag. Anything nerdier is false precision, and you should trust feel before busting out the calipers.
  • 9 1
 @boiancristoph: Banshee has had a note on their website for many years giving a specific number of millimeters at the shock for sag.
  • 1 0
 I wonder how this compares to the Ride Align app that Norco puts out for their bikes.
  • 1 0
 @boiancristoph: At motocross, they measure sag from the tip of the fender to the ground. Off course you already need to know your full and bottom out measurements.
  • 13 0
 "which use a twin tube damping architecture to separate the oil flow into two directions, compression and rebound."

Pretty sure all piggybacks, all shocks really, have oil flowing in 2 directions. The real benefit of twin-tubes is that all the oil has a chance to go through the the base valves, not just the oil displaced by the shaft. The shaft-displaced oil always ends up in the piggyback, but without twin-tubes allowing recirculation of oil to "behind" the piston, all other oil must flow through the valves on the piston. This limited flow of oil through the base valves means those valves have less influence on the damping on a monotube setup, quin, compared to a twin-tube's recirculating setup.
  • 1 0
 Not necessarily. you could have a piston that is only for rebound and flow freely at compression, and the piggyback only counteracts the displaced oil that the damper rod includes in the system.
  • 2 0
 @Notmeatall: Yes, that is included in what I said: monotubes can only put the damper-rod/shaft-displaced oil through to the piggyback, everything else goes through the piston. With what you described the only compression damping would come from the size of the ports to the piggyback relative to the amount of oil displaced by the damper shaft, which is not much.
  • 1 0
 @justinfoil: well, yeah, aparently I was retarding a little.
  • 15 2
 So you lowered the pressure to make it feel good when you "weren't totally engaged on the bike", then complained this wasn't enough support when you were engaged (I assuming you're not going over "abrupt rock rolls" without being fully engaged on the bike). Like, no shit it's going to feel different when cruising vs charging!

Also pretty amazing that 3 psi made such a difference, despite all these set ups somehow always hitting nice round numbers for pressure and sag: exactly 180 psi for exactly 30% (19.5mm), not 183psi, not 178psi, not 19mm (29.2%), not 21mm (31.3%). The Bomber at exactly 200 and DVO at exactly 190 and 160... No one else bracketed 3 psi changes?
  • 5 0
 I find 3-5psi is noticeable on my current super deluxe ultimate but that's a different shock.
  • 2 0
 I find the TTX changes every 2 psi when your in the optimal sag range.
  • 2 1
 @taskmgr: sure it's different. It's not only super deluxe, but also ultimate!
  • 16 5
 One of the cons is: “Higher cost with less adjustments than Fox and RockShox options”. Sounds like grasping at straws.

If you’re gonna talk about Fox knobs, you should suggest they relabel the rebound on the DPX2 as lsc. So maybe having “less adjustments” that actually function correctly isn’t a con at all?
  • 2 1
 It was intentional function in dpx2. I have never measured it personally, but I quess it corrects the ratio between reb and comp forces. Good thing for begginers not interested in suspension tuning.
  • 2 5
 @lightone: that a guess or you work at Fox?
  • 4 0
 @gemas09: I had a few service trainings few years ago as mechanic
  • 5 0
 @lightone: whether that’s intentional or not, problem is when it’s marketed as independent when they really are not. The amount of crossover is so perceptible, you’d think you messed with the wrong clicker.

Dpx2 PB’s review: m.pinkbike.com/news/fox-float-dpx2-shock-first-look-2017.html

See first paragraph, the word “independent” is already there.
  • 1 0
 That or that about 10% of the range in some of the other brands is usable
  • 4 0
 @gemas09: that's only pinlbike's article. Who said it has to be true?
Singlerack doesn't know how to properly instal a coil spring for their review. Look at the pics carefully: www.singletracks.com/mtb-gear/first-impressions-marzocchi-bomber-cr-coil-shock

Don't expect much from text editors...
  • 4 0
 @lightone: oh my god… lol I’m at a loss for words

Well, what I initially meant to say is that reviewers do influence buyers, particularly those without much hands on experience or ability to test several parts. And some of the pros and cons written lately seem to me more influenced by who’s sponsoring PB than by the actual product itself, some are just flat out shameful. It’s a disservice for those potential buyers looking for honest opinions. That’s all.
  • 1 0
 I have the previous version of this shock. Very minimal adjustments but it performs incredibly well. I don't have to spend half my day setting it up then doubting my settings every ride like I did with my floar X2. Ohlins recommended settings based on rider weight and riding style are bang on.
  • 5 0
 (edit - dammit this was supposed to be a reply to self)

For specifics - on my Spec Enduro at 73kg loaded rider and target 30% sag at wheel, every other calculator gives me 400-425# rec, and Ohlins' calc gives me 500# which is definitely closer to my needs. It's a significant difference and saves a fair bit of pain for folks not just spending money on springs, but time.
  • 1 2
 I run 450 spring rate on my stumpy. I’m getting 29% sag on shock stroke and I weigh 78kilos packed. 500 for enduro sounds weird tbh
  • 7 0
 @Phones: The enduro has a 3.3-2.475 leverage rate, stumpy evo has 2.9-2.62ish. Not exactly comparable.
  • 1 2
 @McKai: I know that but usually longer shock stroke requires less spring rate to get proper sag (28-30%) because shock have to compress more than the one with short stroke
  • 2 0
 @Phones: McKai is right, it’s that higher leverage ratio in the first half of the stroke that leads to higher spring rate needed. And @McKai, yes it’s a touch high, I ended up landing on 450 when running 65mm stroke (180ish travel) and 475 for 60mm/stock. Still closer than the simpler calculators that do a straight average.

Also, I just checked my math and I was wrong... I'm 80kg loaded up. So sounds about right that I'm +25# from you.
  • 2 0
 @Phones: what she said
  • 4 0
 I can see how a volume spacer in a bike like the Nomad would be a net loss in performance. stacking progressivity and all that....

Ive got this on my Mondraker Foxy, and at 190lbs, I run the biggest spacer there is, and it adds just that wee bit of support to the last 10% of travel. Initially, I was bottoming constantly, even at 20% sag.

this shock really is spectacular at consistantly and predictably tracing the ground and never being overwhelmed. Once it's dialed, it just gets to work. Also, at this point, it's very very proven....unlike it's competitors from RS and Fox.
  • 1 0
 Which year Foxy, my 2017 XR is running a Fox DPS and I had to ask TFTuned to up the compression damping and max out the volume spacers to get a ride that didn't bottom out (and I like a stiff setup).
The DPX2 only just contacts the frame due to the reservoir, so is a no go. Wondered if this fit and was a step up in performance?
  • 1 0
 @Tristanssid: 2021 Foxy. no idea if it would fit. but the Foxy is really linear, so it needs an appropriate shock tune for sure.
  • 1 2
 I've heard it said Ohlins requires much service attention to maintain it's performance prowess although. If negelected it looses performance easily.
  • 4 1
 @likeittacky: I tear it down every 25 rides. service kits are $30 and oil is Mobile Vactra #2 and #4(damper and aircan), and is about $10 a liter.

takes 30 min


doesn't strike me as more or less than a high end RS or Fox shock
  • 1 0
 @Mtbdialed: Gotcha. was just repeating information passed
  • 3 3
 @likeittacky: I would say it's actually less true than the with Fox or SRAM suspension, in my experience Fox as needed the most maintenance, slam last longer but needs to be completely replaced sooner. EXT was just garbage, Ohlins seems to go about 200 hours no problem.
  • 1 0
 @blk91: i don't agree with all of what you say about sram or ext but defiently do on the other part.
  • 4 1
 @blk91: EXT is garbage? LOL
  • 3 1
 @likeittacky: I was laughing at the person I was replying to. I find EXT to be the cream of the crop of what I have ridden. have 3 bikes with Storia V3 and Era forks. I want to get an Intend fork at some point and run it back to back on my enduro with the Era.
  • 1 1
 @Mtbdialed: any suspension can have an issue especially right now -post covid -quality control, Hence, they were just pumping out product like a cookie factory. doesn't mean its garbage unless multitudes have the issues of similarities. I'm a believer to, in that if something doesn't work or function properly, it's just a obstacle for true refinement which seeks simplicity and with perfection on the horizon.
  • 1 0
 @Mtbdialed: lol had me for a secondWink lol
Thats wonderful to hear about that shock, i'm really considering an EXT they look amazing to!
  • 1 1
 @likeittacky: lol! I think I found th Dalia Lama's burner PB account! Big Grin
  • 1 0
 @Mtbdialed: Not familiar with that term but i sense sarcasm Blank Stare
  • 4 0
 "Ohlins' theory on this is said to allow very low speed movements without totally blocking off all forces."

Why is this called a theory? It does exactly what is says it does. Obviously it's adjusting preload on the high-speed shim stack, forcing flow primarily through the low-speed port while still letting the HS valve to open (blow-off) when needed for big hits. Just like pretty much every climb switch. (Except CaneCreek, which slows down both low-speed circuits to really control bob the right way, since body-weight movements are primarily low-shaft-speed events.)
  • 3 1
 A theory is an explanation for something that agrees with the observations You might be thinking of hypothesis
  • 2 0
 @boozed: hypothesis doesn't work either. It's not a proposed explanation, it's how the system was designed. The hypothesis or theory would be that this particular setting is ideal for "lockout" type levers, not the details of how this lever achieves the specific settings.
  • 2 0
 "since body-weight movements are primarily low-shaft-speed events"


speak for yourself! Big Grin
  • 5 0
 I don't need Ohlins suspension, but man, would I love to have a beautiful metallic green bike with black and yellow Ohlins suspension.
  • 5 0
 I think the Ohlins is the only shock in this test that is purposely designed to be custom tuned. Major pro if you're spending this kind of money on a shock.
  • 7 0
 I’m just hear waiting for the Manitou review tbh
  • 3 2
 Here’s the Mara Pro review: It’s a decent shock, but not as good as our high $$$ sponsorship Fox and Rockshox.
  • 3 1
 I keep hearing that Ohlins shocks take a long time to dial in. I'm not much of a tinker-er when it comes to suspension setup, so I feel like I'd be better suited with a Bomber air than something like this. Seems like a great shock, it's just probably not for me.
  • 5 1
 Dialing in is not tinkering. Tinkerers change things just to change them, to see the difference and then change it again. Dialing in is just done in the beginning, perhaps some bracketing and/or just going by feel for a handful of runs. Then you are 100% free to just leave it. Set it & forget it, perhaps.

At least the Ohlins gives you the ability to really dial in, unlike the Bomber where you can't even set some things, so it's just the forget part. Though in the Bomber review they mentioned having to remember settings, so who the hell knows what they even mean by set or forget.
  • 2 0
 @justinfoil: You're right about tinkering; although, what he is implying and how i understand it is, (setting it up is a bigger chore) than he may be attuned to or have the patience for and prefers a simpler shock to do initial set up with, that being for him ...the Bomber .
I can totally understand this, whereas suspension settings and preference in my experience can vary quite a bit, depending on many things and become frustrating when all we wanna do is ride and have fun doing it, not being bogged down in frustration, unsure if its set up optimally to render the full benefits of all the settings available.
  • 2 0
 @likeittacky: exactly. Sorry if the wording didn't come off right haha
  • 1 0
 Get an Öhlins coil and go with your suspension tuners recomendations.
  • 1 1
 @fartymarty: Or save the money by going with with the Marzocchi.
  • 1 0
 @likeittacky: "not being bogged down in frustration, unsure if its set up optimally to render the full benefits of all the settings available."

But it's ok if you're frustrated at suboptimal set up because it just doesn't have the settings available?
  • 1 0
 @justinfoil: Depends on the rider, how and where they ride + their awareness of those things. Many people can not differentiate changes or an added bell or whistle; while others are hypersensitive to everything... which comes with a lot of experience mostly. So yea, "suboptimal set up" can be all one needs or desires. Thus, not being frustrated to those lack of settings.

Im personally more frustrated with whether or not i should have 1psi more or less, depending on where i'm riding that day, how hot / cold it is or if i'm going to wear a pack and how much crap i'll put in it; than i am about if i just had independent high speed- rebound / compression.
  • 1 0
 @likeittacky: see, lack of adjustments adds frustration for you. If you could simply add or remove a click here or there, you probably wouldn't be thinking about 1 psi. Especially since the spring is the first thing to set up, and once you've got that dialed it doesn't really change for anything (except taking the same bike to the extremes of ride style, like doing a DH race or slopestyle on a trail bike). You seem to be on the "notices things slash cares about thing" end of the spectrum, so it makes sense you'd be frustrated with a lack of adjustments. Especially if the ones you do have are coarse settings. You'll worry more about PSI because even just one or two clicks could make enough change that it gets into shitty set-up territory.
  • 1 0
 @justinfoil:This thread was about other people, not me. I used a hypothetical to make a point not to suggest otherwise.
  • 1 0
 @likeittacky: "I'm personally more frustrated with... where I'm riding... if I'm going to wear... what I'll put... than I am if I had..."

That's not about you? Lot of "I"s for 3rd person.
  • 1 0
 @justinfoil: You made your point.,now go ride your bike!
  • 1 0
 @likeittacky: Already did that today. And the day before yesterday. And have plans to tomorrow.
  • 1 0
 @justinfoil: pat yourself on the back
  • 14 7
 terrible reviews boys...
  • 7 5
 Its PB what do you expect?
  • 5 0
 Did you all forget to include the outro to the video? It cuts out pretty drastically.
  • 8 1
 PB hates Ohlins
  • 2 0
 Not enough advertising or freebies
  • 3 0
 I can sense that as well. I have been riding /racing MTB since mid 90's with much of that at the expert level or higher. I've ridden Rockshox, Manitou, Fox, MRP, DVO, etc etc. Ohlins is almost hands down better than all of them (major manufacturers). Expensive? Yes. However, the (get what you pay for) is very true here. Spend time getting them set up for your riding and bike...boom.
  • 4 1
 Less adjustments is not a con unless it actually makes a difference for adjusting. Putting in 60 clicks doesn't make a shock better, and neither does a HSC, LSC, and Medium speed compression
  • 2 0
 The whole point of the Ohlins shocks is you get to pick from 7 different tunes for both compression AND rebound - both circuits have 7 different options that can be selected individually. This only adds $100 from new and it allows you to get really close with your tune so you don't rely on the external adjustments as much.
  • 5 0
 Pink Bike recommends the shock from a huge company over Ohlins shock what a shock.
  • 5 0
 Why was the fox not criticised for needing Allen keys to adjust the settings
  • 1 0
 Becaues they advertise with PB....a LOT
  • 4 1
 I can notice a lot of tiny adjustments on my bike but not really sure if 3psi is noticeable or it is just a placebo effect we cast on our selves.
  • 6 0
 I personally find that I notice smaller adjustments, like 3psi, in my fork rather than my shock.
  • 7 1
 @ZSchnei: 3psi isn't a small adjustment in a fork that sits at around 70psi, at all.
  • 2 0
 It depends on how high volume the spring is, smaller changes in pressure are more noticible in high volume air springs, typically found in forks. I know that a 3 psi difference in noticible in my Manitou Mezzers air spring, where it wasn't as noticible in my Fox 36.
  • 3 2
 Have someone else change your fork by 3 psi, or not, just don't tell you. See if you can tell.
  • 5 0
 @GunnarGunnarGunnar: yeah. instead of thinking about PSI, think about %.

then you understand why 67v70psi is noticeable and 190v187 is not. lol
  • 1 0
 @mattBeer I am kinda confused by the graphic showing how the HSC lever routes with the shim stack. Does adjusting the shim stack affect all 3 settings or only 2&1, not P?
  • 1 2
 I really don't understand the lately hype with Ohlins.

There're a lot of tests and articles of theirs products which are eulogistic when a lot of users are complaining about their performance. A few people during bike park sessions told me that they had struggle to adjust properly their suspension.
I tried too and i lend my bike to a few friends to have theirs thoughts and they were unanimous, it's not rideable as it is. So i finally sent my RXF36 Air and my TTX2 to a Professional tuning. They confirmed me that it's necessary to remove the famous "grey spacer" from the fork to improve the sensitivity, wich is quite strange for an high range suspension. They also made a proper tuning to decrease the HSC damping and the sensitivity of the TTX.

But the results are not turning out as i expected. It's better for the fork but there 're still to much damping in the HSC, a too significant rebound even full closed, wich result to a pain in my palms that i never had before, even with a cheap fork. Like if it's locked on HSC. I have a similar problem with the TTX. A weak sensitivity on small bumps and a harsh feeling on HSC.
I finally switched for a 38 grip2 and a DHX2 and it's like night and day.

There're also good feedbacks of theirs products so i wonder if it's not a question of damping tunes wich are not suitable for all frames. Or maybe some compagnies ask for a specific tune for theirs bikes.
  • 2 0
 "Varibable port valve"... I knew this was all just technical babble!
  • 6 0
 Means you can actually tune the shock vs other poppet valve-based shock designs. This is a good thing despite the techno babble.
  • 1 0
 It looks like the only shock in the test which made Henry to talk a bit more into
  • 2 1
 Been waiting 4 months for a replacement damper body for my TTX 1. Still no due date!
@ohlins terrible after sales support!!
  • 3 0
 In the states it's pretty good.
  • 2 1
 Have a Trunnion 205x65mm if anyone’s interested. Used if for one season and serviced after. Fits Jekyll, Spire, Ransom…
  • 2 0
 Fewer* adjustments.
  • 1 0
 where would the float X fit in with this group?
  • 1 0
 It’s between the Marzocchi and the X2. I have one and it really works great.
  • 1 4
 what is the real difference between the 90 USD rock shox and this 800 $ shock.. can someone explain if there is a night and day difference really in the tech and feel?

To me its actually is all to the rider ... I constantly see clowns with 13,000 bikes who cant ride for shit and others with old 1200 usd bikes who rip through trails.
  • 1 0
 No Mara Pro for shock week? Weak.
  • 1 0
 Why isn't there more love for x-fusion?
  • 1 0
 In europe they have a bad name for screwing customers out of warranty and bad reliability.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.044848
Mobile Version of Website