Powered by Outside

DH Field Test: YT Tues - Ready to Race or Rampage

Jul 3, 2024
by Matt Beer  

Believe it or not, this is the new YT Tues MK4. At first glance, it’s tough to tell the new and the old apart but there are plenty of changes about. The main thing you should know is that there is now just one frame that handles either dual 29” inch wheels or an MX set up.

Further adjustments throughout the Tues allow it to play freely in the bike park or grab the bull by the horns and take to the racetrack - Vali Höll has already scooped two World Cup wins on.

At the moment, the new frame only comes in carbon, inherently driving the price up but the weight down. Still, it is the lightest bike on test and the components on the Core 4 model offer undeniable value.

Tues Core 4 Details

• Carbon frame
• Mixed or dual 29" wheels
• 4-bar suspension
• Travel: 200mm / 203mm fork
• Head Angle: 63.2 - 63.5 degrees
• Sizes: S, M, L (tested), XL, XXL
• Reach: 430, 450, 470, 490, 510mm
• Chainstay lengths (short position): 438 (S,M), 440 (L), 450mm (XL, XXL)
• 16.14 kg / 35.6 lb
• Price: $5,999 USD
yt-industries.com



Contents

Matt Beer
Location: Squamish, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Height: 5'10" / 178 cm
Weight: 170 lb / 77 kg
Industry affiliations / sponsors: None
Instagram: @mattb33r

bigquotesThe Tues is not a slugger that only comes alive on the roughest tracks. In fact, it’s quite the opposite and blazes through jump lines better than some shorter travel bikes. At the same time, it can still handle those weathered downhill tracks without flying too close to the sun. Matt Beer




Review YT Tues. Photos by Tom Richards.

Frame Details

Amongst the cleanly-crafted carbon frame lie three flip chips to adjust the geometry: one at the lower shock mount to change the BB height/head angle, another at the dropout for chainstay length variations, and a clever wheel size adjustment housed in the linkage.

Flipping between rear wheel sizes is straightforward in theory, but a third set of hands could come in handy. To make such that change, you’ll need to remove the link, flip it to the other side of the bike and reinstall the chips in the orientation as identified. The procedure can be a little tangley while trying to juggle all of the pieces, including the extra washers that double-seal the bearings.

To adjust between chainstay lengths, a flip-chip is located in the dropout but requires the brake mount can be reversed to account for the rotor displacement. Wisely none of the frame’s hardware, aside from the bottom bracket, threads directly into the carbon - even the upper shock mount nut and bolt are replaceable.

Throughout the rest of the frame, tidy integrated fork bumpers double as the entrance for internally routed housings and a decent level of molded rubber lines the swing arm.




Review YT Tues. Photos by Tom Richards.

Suspension

YT didn’t reinvent the wheel when building the latest generation Tues. They stuck with the four-bar design they’ve been using for over a decade, however the leverage ratio has been lowered in overall progression. The goal here was to offer a more consistent mid-stroke for more support, while still supplying a supple feeling at the beginning and building enough bottom out resistance at the end of the 200mm of travel. The Tues models are equipped with 250x75mm coil shock but there’s the possibility to run an air spring with this leverage curve as well.

Looking at the kinematic graphs, there’s nothing alarming or extreme about the values. On the trail, that’s apparent because the Tues never does anything erratic or unexpected. It’s mild mannered and responsive on flow tracks. When pushed hard on the most serious trails, it’s predictable, no matter what size rocks are in front of you, or lack thereof.

As expected, it doesn’t have the same bump-eating prowess of the high pivot machines or quite the same ability to stay poised under braking. Then again, it does get up to speed a whole lot sooner, whether that’s pumping to accelerate or just pedalling.

photo
photo
photo
photo




photo

Geometry

Typically, we see downhill bikes offered in three and sometimes four sizes, so it’s ultra rare to see YT produce the Tues in five sizes, especially since this model is made from carbon, which comes with an increased investment cost.

To the customer though, that’s a huge bonus because the Tues can fit a huge range of riders, all the way from 154cm (5’), up to 203cm (6’8”). The reach measurements on the five sizes start at 430mm and work their way up in 20mm increments, making the XXL 510mm.

Flip-chips were first brought into frame design to change the head tube angle and BB height. You’ll find one in place on the lower shock mount which toggles the Tues between a 63.5-degree head tube angle and 351mm BB height in the “regular” setting and 63.2 and 346 numbers in the “low” position.

Adding to the wealth of in-frame customization is the fact that the chainstays are somewhat size specific, on top of having that 5mm of adjustment. In the shorter setting, the chainstays for each frame size are as follows; SM, MD: 438-443mm, LG: 440-445, XL, XXL: 450-455.

There are no limitations on which frame size can handle a given wheel size either - even the size small frame can handle a 29” rear wheel in the shorter chainstay setting, although it’s unlikely you’ll see that combination.






Test Bike Setup

By now it's clear that the Tues can handle both a 27.5 or 29” rear wheel. During this test, we exclusively opted for the smaller of the two to make the most comparable notes between bikes, however, you can find our thoughts on the full 29er setup in the First Ride where we did back to back laps comparing the two wheel sizes.

In that previous session, I settled on a 450 pound spring and found that to be ideal, never bottoming unexpectedly or riding too high in the travel. The rear shock clickers ran close to the advised settings from Fox for that spring weight and travel. Up front, the fork was pumped to 87 psi with 5 volume spacers with the damper more open than Fox's suggested.

We also kept the chainstay in the longer setting of 445mm, which isn’t as long as we’d hoped for. A 10mm flip-chip might have been a better use of that feature. The lower shock mount stayed in the lower/slacker of the two positions to give a 63.2-degree head tube angle and the top crown sat on top of the tall head set cap.




Review YT Tues. Photos by Tom Richards.

Descending

From a side view, the Tues’ sharp straight lines give a low-profile look to the bike and that’s an apparent trait of how it rides as well. What the frame might lack in terms of a slack head angle, it makes up for in stability with a low center gravity. The stance is not too far from the Frameworks DH too and could be thought of as the new-school downhill geometry where stability is gained from higher stack values and longer wheelbase numbers rather than just a slack head angle. This puts the rider on the bike where their feet are low to the ground giving a proud standing position. This places their hands more so on top of the front axle pushing down on it rather than behind it pushing it forward. What that means on the trail is that while thundering through wide open sections or destroyed bike park corners the front wheel has an inclination to tuck rather than stand against the bumps.

I could see some racers installing offset headset cups for a slacker head angle and possibly wishing for a longer chainstay. But YT set out to build a versatile gravity bike, one that can be raced flat-out and still remain active, yet provide responsive nature for other riders who could care less about lap times. That’s where the compact wheelbase lends to being much more reactive through jump trails and tight corners compared to a bike like that Intense M1, which lumbers along until it gets up to speed.

Either way, one thing you’ll find on the race track and in bike parks alike are braking bumps, and although the Tues tracks through them moderately well, it doesn’t come with some clattering that can be felt through the bike. Doing back-to-back laps on four other bikes made this apparent and, like the Glory, there was a higher degree of feedback from the chain moving about. Another culprit that could tame some of the vibration down was the short amount of housing that can hit the frame near lower shock mount.

Components like O-Chain and STFU chain dampers are designed to negate those vibrations and forces felt by the rider which ultimately lead to a smoother ride. In fact, most of the YT Mob team is running such devices. There's also been experimentation with an idler pulley to accomplish similar tasks, but that can have negative trade-offs in the pedaling efficiency department.

Overall though, the Tues was one of the easiest bikes to just get on with. Its high versatility and regular flavor can cater to any type of rider with its various geometry adjustments, plus, all of that comes at relatively low cost in comparison to some of the other bikes on test.



Review YT Tues. Photos by Tom Richards.


Technical Report

Acros Headset: High bar heights might be all the rage, but in our case, we wanted them lower. That wasn’t possible due to the huge top cap on the head set. Of course switching that out in the long run, or moving to a lower-rise bar is an option, would be a possibility, however, we likely won’t be the only ones to run into this issue. In our opinion, starting with a slimmer top cap is ideal - it’s easier to add stem spacers than find a new headset component.

Flip-chips: The Tues has two sets of these; one at the dropout and another in the seatstay-link pivot. The chainstays can be altered by 5mm, which is hardly noticeable and 10mm would have been a more logical choice for the trouble. Changing between the rear wheel sizes involves removing the two “wings” or links that the shock passes through and switching them to the other side of the bike. Flipping the chips in those is the second step. In doing so, you’ll need a careful hand to manage a seal and an aluminum cap/spacer on each face of the bearing (those have a specific direction that they need to face as well) - tidy in theory, cluttered in practice.

Cable management: When I first rode the Tues, the chosen test track was slower and smoother than the high-speed, hammered trails of the Whistler Bike Park. That’s where we noticed more noise from the bike. The housing can tap against the small arm of the lower shock mount.

Up front, a tidy fork bumper guards the top tube from the fork stanchion while creating a port for the internal cable routing. That’s well executed except that for forks narrower than the Fox 40 the turning radius might be tighter than expected.




Pros

+ Snappy handling without sacrificing too much stability
+ Versatile frame adjustments
+ Excellent value

Cons

- Although well executed, more frame adjustments means more pieces of hardware to manage
- Adding chain damping components would alleviate feedback in that area



Pinkbike's Take

bigquotesThere's something to be said about a bike that doesn't shout about its strengths in one area, but executes them all in a reasonable fashion. Sure, there are more aggressive bikes out there, or ones with complex suspension systems that feel magical at times, but totally being regular is a good thing. The Tues is just that - an easy pleaser.

Other points that shouldn't be overlooked are the value in the carbon frame and fan-favorite components, as well as the broad sizing scale and unlimited wheel configurations.
Matt Beer







Author Info:
mattbeer avatar

Member since Mar 16, 2001
386 articles

65 Comments
  • 78 9
 Just gotta give it some that HUCK TUES.....sit on that thang.
  • 2 0
 I ideally went for 50 thumbs up for this Still laughing
  • 67 1
 I think the value on this bike is the real kicker. There's not a lot of brands out there that rival YT's value proposition.
  • 73 0
 Exactly, it’s clearly written in black and YT
  • 4 0
 @sewer-rat: nice
  • 28 0
 Cleanest lines in the game right now.
  • 15 1
 The Tues has always been such a good looking bike.
  • 24 3
 Surely the DH bike of choice for many purely on looks and price, but "rides like a long travel enduro bike" is not what I would expect a DH bike to ride like. I need those blues to feel like greens.
  • 21 1
 Smurfs to feel like Kermit?
  • 3 1
 @bigtim: precisely
  • 2 0
 Yes, I think people starting on XC bikes significantly slowed their learning curve.
  • 21 1
 Seems like a miss to post a Tues review on a Wed.
  • 15 0
 Pretty cool how a downhill bike weighs pretty much the same as some of the "trail" bikes out there.
  • 14 2
 Another advantage is that you can buy this for about the same price as the new stumpy with Sram’s new exclusive junk drivetrain.
  • 7 0
 Is it asking too much for rider height and weight to be included in all bike reviews? This seems like such a basic starting point, and yet it’s lacking in most reviews. I will say though, Pinkbike is generally better than a lot of the other sites.
  • 4 0
 yes you take that back
  • 3 0
 Fair point, we probably should have those in every review. In the meantime, you can see the rider stats in the welcome to DH bike field test article

www.pinkbike.com/news/welcome-to-the-2024-downhill-field-test.html
  • 2 0
 @Superboost The article has been updated with that information.
  • 1 0
 @tomivorrichards: it would be appreciated I’m sure by some. If I Google that bike and “review”, it doesn’t bring me to the original field test announcement. It will bring me to an article that goes into great detail (thank you!) about fit and setup, with no relatable size information for the rider. It’s wild so many sites are lacking this information. The bike industry is hell bent on over complicating bike sizing. Again, Pinkbike generally does a great job with providing this information so, thank you.
  • 1 0
 @rickybobby19: if only I could. If only….
  • 1 0
 @mattbeer: you’re the man Matt. Big fan of your reviews. Keep up the good work.
  • 6 0
 Today I learned that this model is called the "two-eh-zz", and not "two-zz". Smile
  • 4 0
 I had always thought the T was silent.
  • 20 0
 In fact it's "too ass" lol

"Tu es!" meaning "Do it!"
  • 2 0
 "although the Tues tracks through them moderately well, it doesn’t come with some clattering that can be felt through the bike" is some seriously free-form beat poetry bike reviewing. What exactly are you describing here @mattbeer?
  • 3 0
 What's the real bike weight? YT's website says 16.7Kg for a small, no tubes no bottle but here you are saying 16.14? Please help
  • 3 2
 This is a DH bike. Why would weight be at all relevant? A significant number of pros are adding weight to their bikes...
  • 7 0
 @rojo-1: Why would you NOT want a bike review to include an accurate weight? Lmao
  • 1 0
 @rojo-1: Because I want to know if it's lighter than the Cube 215 --- and weight is still important
  • 4 1
 Bet it wins every review in german mags. (Or canyon..)
  • 1 2
 German mags are soooo objective...
  • 2 0
 Genau!
  • 2 0
 @DonaldTee: they score major points for actually objectively measuring things (which is very rare, unfortunately)... but then lose those points for finding a very not-objective reason for letting the German brands win.
  • 2 0
 Amongst the frame, the wheel was not reinvented
  • 8 10
 I wish manufacturers would give customers the option to have a 27.5'' front wheel. Not just for DH bikes. My Rocky Mountain Maiden had a spacer cup for the head tube and different attachment points in the rear for wheel and brake. Not that hard to do really.
  • 14 1
 Kind of sounds like you found a manufacture that gave you that option. Well done!
  • 5 0
 I feel like you could use any extended lower cup like the one pivot makes as long as it’s the right head tube diameter.
  • 4 0
 The new Knolly Warden does that. And can be setup with a 200 dual crown 27.5 fork, and long stroked to have 180 in the rear.
  • 1 0
 Oops, nevermind. Misread the post.
  • 2 0
 The current Trek Session allows for full 27.5 and they provide a headset extender cup to facilitate
  • 1 0
 Scott Gambler has this option as well.
  • 6 0
 They have a freeride edition Tues that comes with 27.5's front and back.
  • 1 0
 @ezryder613: Only see MX versions on their website
  • 2 0
 @theteaser: us.yt-industries.com/products/bikes/tues-27/core-1/710/tues-core-1

AND just $3k so maybe worth shipping north to CAN (not sure if its just US sales only though) I'd been looking for months & wanted to buy, bought but I need mx & not looking to replace a front 27 w/ a 29 - or wait another 5-6 weeks til mid Aug when park season's almost over. Easily the sickest looking dh bike of 'em all in my view.
  • 1 0
 @Mtn-Goat-13: right I missed that :-)
  • 1 0
 @ezryder613: I believe they're keeping the previous version as a freeride version, new model is only 29 front
  • 2 0
 The spec section is missing from the article?
  • 1 0
 @Kimbers We condensed the format a little but it is covered in the video. The specs can be found in the First Ride here (linked in the article above as well): www.pinkbike.com/news/first-ride-yt-tues-2025.html
  • 1 0
 That's a hell of a good looking frame 3
  • 1 2
 First ride review seemed to say 29er rear was better, but you choose mullet for this test? I don't get it
  • 9 0
 the other bikes are mullet so they chose it to even out the comparison, dunno if you read the piece but it's in the test bike setup portion
  • 4 3
 @KolaPanda: just doesn't make sense to me. Test each bikes in its best configuration.
  • 10 1
 @Endo79: We stuck with the same wheel sizes for a fair comparison across the board. "Best" is a personal opinion.
  • 2 0
 @mattbeer: Matt, have you ridden the Canyon, and if so, what is your opinion compared to the YT?
  • 3 1
 I totally agree, who gives a sh*t about fair comparisons
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.040862
Mobile Version of Website