...are there some faults in the list with the protected status? Camille Balanche is leading the series and isn't protected...Reece Wilson is protected, Benoit Coulanges isn't?
I assume Reese Wilson is protected because he was protected before his injury. I remember that e.g. Greg Minnaar or Myriam Nicole where not protected after they came back from injury a few years ago. In alpine skiing racers are also "protected" for a couple of races if they come back from injury. But I also don't know why the P is missing for some riders.
With no qualifier on the last race, it appears that the top portion of riders go in reverse order of their overall ranking to start the race (top 60 for the men), and after they finish, the rest of the riders race in ascending order of overall ranking (from 61 to 187 for the men).
I assumed that they still had qualifying, there just weren't any points for it. Certainly in previous years the top riders didn't go mid way through the pack. This is probably the qualifying order
@edspratt: Excuse me for asking. If it's the wrong list, why leave it like that??? I'd assume, that PB should correct this and put on the start list for the finals?... Come on guys....
@chmurka3rg: The finals start list is at the top of the page. There never was a wrong list in the article it just wasn't clear that the original list in the article was for qualifying not finals, but this was posted before qualifying even happened.
Sad, but probably the right call. That track looks rough and if either his head or spine is injured, best to let it heal and hopefully have a better season next year. He can only lose one position in standings I think, and it wasn't realistic that he would move up. He did fantastic this year considering he already missed one race, and will miss this one too.
But I also don't know why the P is missing for some riders.