PB photographers Dave Trumpore and Matt DeLorme turned their cameras onto the pit action at round two of the Enduro World Series on the island of Tasmania. The developing story seems to be wide tires and low gears - a testament to the challenges that lie ahead.
Stages power meter nestled behind Lewis Buchanan's left crank arm.
Martin Maes' GT
A close up of the linkage on Martin Maes' GT.
Not the most common place to mount a Garmin - on Martin Maes' top tube.
Cecile Ravanel's remote-lockout coil shock
Cecile Ravanel is running a setup similar to what we've seen Jerome Clementz use in the past, with a GripShift remote lockout, and the new Reverb remote underneath.
Climbing? You bet. Lots of riders running SRAM Eagle.
Moto foam to keep the mud from collecting.
Mark Scott's custom Santa Cruz Hightower.
Cut tires: the balance between grip and rolling resistance is a constant battle.
More than a few riders are running their wide tire options.
Bash guards on lots of bikes this weekend.
Robin Wallner's Ibis
Robin Wallner's Shimano DX pedals are holdover from his DH days.
Both front and rear shifting from one Shimano Di2 shifter for Greg Callaghan
Greg Callaghan is one of the few still running a front derailleur.
Some custom touches for Greg Callaghan
Remy Absalon's Scott Genius
Remy Absalon's shock with remote lockout
Damien Oton's Devinci Spartan.
Matt Stoddard's Hope
Remi Gauvin and his Rocky Mountain Altitude.
Loose Dog Lewis' Santa Cruz Hightower
Yoann rides with Aggy.
Katy Winton's Trek Slash
Are your tires as wide as Dave Trumpore's fist? Lewis Buchanan's are.
Rae Morrisan's Liv Hail, along with some details.
Lewis Buchanan is using a LitPro GPS/video to track stages.
Lots of bikes would look really good chrome'd out but manufacturers tend to listen to market analysts instead and use whatever color came out as "That's rad!" from the last focus group (i.e. neon everywhere).
I was thinking exactly the same haha. Maybe it's just special because it reminds of the legendary old GT Zascar hardtail frames? God was I in love with those bikes. Pictures of Hans Rey with his statue of liberty stand on a chrome Zascar come to mind. Couldn't get any better than that.
@mazze: My mate still has one in mint condition with the Judy SL and Smoke/Dart tyres. Flite saddle too. He never uses it but says he'll never sell it either.
its too bad the industry forgot how sick polished, raw, oil slick black(just add all the old intense options here) are. instead, weve got bright lime greens, pinks, and baby blues....the era of feminizing the man.
@b-mack: the reverse sceme custom carbon zaskar gt had the other year with carbon black frame with crome logos and stickers should be standard on carbon gt:s imho.
@b-mack: Fell in love with Konas ball burnished HeiHei back in the day. Thought I was getting the same on my Abra Cadabra. Turned out to be chrome paint :-(
I love the way GTs Look, but every time i have ridden one with their rear suspension, i have been sketched out by the way the bb moves underneath my feet... #justsaying
@mazze: Couldn't agree more *reminiscing*, those were the days. Hardcopy, dog eared magazines with a few teaser shots of the bike. Have a retro ball burnished Zaskar frame in the garage, original in mint condition. Refuse to throw it away!
@thepwnstar39: Rumor has it the full launch for the bike will be at Sea Otter. I've heard the specs are 150mm rear/160mm front, and it will be available in both carbon and alloy frames.
@adrock-whistler: alloy frame would be rad. looks pretty sick. Hope the rear is a bit stiffer than on the previous model but I'll happily have one again
Hey @RockyMountainBicycles, that Altitude looks good! Any details on the angles and travel on that 2018 beaut? Maybe I'll take a stroll over to a certain legend's garage and see what he's got hanging around
@CaptainSnappy certain legend would not be Tippie...he was was selling all his Rockys on Instagram today . But maybe the Godfather has somethin special lyin around????!
How does Robin Wallner fit a bottle in there? I tried to put a cage on my HD3 and every bottle I can find contacts the piggyback on the X2 shock. It's a size large, I would think something would fit.
@IamZOSO: quite a few companies make cheaper versions..I got a lezyne side loading cage for 20 $..composite material, cheap and light...on a nomad , so not much room, but with the side loader works well
@chantalfelten: I have a zefal side loading cage that cost 5 euros... that's msrp. It's thermoplastic, light as they come and if it breaks I'll just go and get another. Works fine with my 500ml elite waterbottle and my 750ml podium big chill.
@justwan-naride: ha nice, the lezyne was all I could find round here ...when I was looking all the " bros " were recommending the crazy expensive arundel ...I was like yeah nope , rather get a new tire or something for that extra cash ?? That arundel is the best example of how cyclist often don't look at function and focus on Shiny.
Love riding with a bottle for so many reason, but one unexpected side effect Has been that I love buying bottles from local shops in places we visit to ride...give back to a local shop for beta and have a great little useful memory to take back home
@2bigwheels: That's the biggest complaint I have against bottles on mountainbikes. At least back in the day it would annoy me to see lost bottles on the side of the rougher descends, apparently rattled loose from the bottle cage. Either riders were too lazy to hike back up and find it, couldn't find it or didn't feel like interrupting the flow of these fun descends. Either way, it is a chunky piece of litter. For the rest of course, it is a personal choice that doesn't affect me or the environment.
@2bigwheels: never lost a bottle from spec side loaded cage. Happened from top loaded Bontrager and Topeak. And my trails are not smooth. And if I rode Shore I probably wouldn't use water bottle... And at least 99.999% of mountain bikers in the world will never ride the shore, and 90% will not ride rough trails fast. Which may bring us to a conclusion that water bottle is an attribute of riders that are not as good as an average Pinkbike big mouth. Which I guess was the point here. Skill signaling. Salute the heroes. There is still enough money in Water Bottle adaptation for a frame maker to make room for one
@WAKIdesigns: I don't dare to go into the statistics of it. Riding rough terrain fast is often smoother, so that 90% is more likely to lose a bottle (if you sport any) than the other 10% on that same section of trail.
In think more than enough frame manufacturers build frames with room for a bottle. But this room created sacrifices how low the frame could be. And this low top tube (or actually the unnamed difference between standover and bb height) is what makes it fun to corner. So it is a compromise. Either have a low top tube, or have room for a bottle. I don't mind bottle-cage-compatible frames being designed and build for those who like them. But I'd hate to see bikes like the Kona Process and the Alutech ICB2.0 disappear just because they don't accept a bottle inside the front triangle.
@vinay: how is low frame making it easier to corner? That's a stretch... go through some older pictures from World Cups on grassy off-cambers, like LaBresse or Les 2 Alpes, this is where bikes get leaned most if the foot doesn't come out. Or that Red Bull vid with Finn Iles (which is a must Watch) Check their body position. Where does frame and their outer knee come in conflict? I ride 17" HT frame with straight TT on pumptrack. Never ever had an issue with knee slamming into top tube. Spec tried to sell this BS about lowered center of mass of a frame thus lowered standover and frame designs inspired by Salvadore Dali's paintings. I have utmost repect to Jason Chamberlain (I ride pedals with his Nickname on them, love the guy) but that theory is a stretch too...
And fast over rough terrain, boooh... that's a blurry guey chasm of reference. The most times I lost water bottle was on chatter on fireroad going 40-60 km/h, or on a road ride with top mounted cage when I rode onto some bigger bump I didn't notice. At 60 or more.
@WAKIdesigns: Ha, I can't get too scientific about this. That is, I haven't done research on the level of: change one thing and leave everything else the same. Also, it's been a very long while since I've ridden with a bottle. I don't spend too much time riding fireroads but when I do find a bottle, it is on a rougher descend. I was done with these when the bottle drops in front of you when riding down a staircase. It is uncomfortable having these in the way. The only thing that comes close to "science" or "proper comparison" is when riding down an escalator. It just feels much smoother when the (empty) escalator runs up compared to when you ride down a stationary escalator. It is not necessarily your speed being higher of course, but your velocity relative to the steps of the escalator is higher when the escalator runs up.
As for cornering. I'm about 6ft tall (182cm last time I measured, but that was with shoes) and I currently ride a 16" hardtail. When I started out (as an adult), I was advised to get a 19" frame. When I was done with that one (spent too much on replaceable mech hangers, and the dropouts were bent too) I got a steel 18" Voodoo Erzulie. I loved how I could move it underneath me in corners. Felt much more fun, never said it was easier. But more fun, definitely. When I bent that one in a crash (not broken but the head tube must have gotten steeper than a BMX, Joe Murray said it was still good to ride) I got my current steel 16" DMR Switchback. Surely even lower must be even more fun. And I felt it was. Of course low frames from that era (I got the DMR back in 2008 or so but it was already old then) are short too, so that was my compromise. Reach is about 585mm and I'm running a 40mm stem. I'm definitely tempted to invest in a one of these modern frames that is still low but gets me some more length.
That said, of course when you're coasting with the inside pedal up, most of the time the top tube isn't much in the way. Though sometimes (I feel) it is leaning against my calf so apparently I would still enjoy having some more room there. Same with pumptracks. Corners are typically banked so usually you can stay centered. Where it is in the way is when you do have to pedal on a level corner or tight uphill switchback. You want to lean the bike towards the hill so there is the crank you want to have pointing up. Of course ratcheting is going to help but still, a lower top tube there would give more room for a longer stroke. Not sure whether uphill switchbacks are covered in Ryan's Cornering Continuum, still need to look into that one.
But long story short, whether it is easier or not I cannot confirm. But the low top tube feels like more fun and to me, that's what matters.
What tire is that under dave's hand? It looks like a maxxis labeled tire, but the center knobs look like a magic mary look-a-like. The corner knobs aren't angled, either, like Schwalbe's.
Yes you need Eagle to climb. That bit with Graves running 38t front to 42t rear in Whistler with 2 ply tyres was a set up. Never happened. I didn't know I could climb until I bought Eagle with 28t oval. Nino Schurters gold medal won on Eagle is golder than his 2 gold medals won on XX1
Oh Waki, obviously you don't need Eagle to climb. But for someone who isn't a superhuman like Graves, wouldn't an easier gear be nice to have over the course of a 57km, 1700m vert day?
@jaame: That's something I agree with, although I love 1x for "normal" rides. If budget was not a problem I'd certainly try Shimano's single shifter 2x Di2 XTR. Seems like a best of both worlds approach.
The issue with Eagle is that if Shimano would make a 9-54 cassette, some journalists and some people would still find it useful... off course it would have to be Shimano or Sram, because only a huge company can make Emperor's New Clothes... if E13 or OneUP made one, people would laugh at it, but a big company that makes a press camp inviting journos from all over the world, pays for their flights, hotels and food, will totally make an impact. I mean for fks sake they sell electronic shifting... rear mech costs 500 bucks. Some people want to ride bikes, not competitively, that are lighter than an average dumb bell used on the gym. They will go through an hour of excruciating high intensity circuit training with 20kg dumb bell in each hand, yet they are prepared to spend 3k to take 11kg 140 bike to 10kg. ooooooh pedalling is sooo hard. Oooooh, I have 1700m to climb today, let's check if there's a Strava segment for this fire road climb, perhaps I will be able to get into top100. Oooooh I wish I ordered the 20g lighter LB rims.
Snake oil FTW.
As much as the Liv Hail is a woman's bike, there's nothing inherently feminine about it apart from the Liv brand from what I can tell. I actually like how it looks from a man's perspective.
Liv actually does women's specific geo for their frames that is distinct from the dimensions on the equivalent bikes produced by Giant. Cool enough in my opinion that I bought a Liv for my wife.
Wonder how much pressure Shimano is putting on their team guys to ride a front derailleur. See, at least one pro guy still rides them! DI2 is cool, somebody buy it, pay no attention to the fact that people actually want what SRAM's selling!
@alaric0108: Front derailleur is bad with a trigger type shifter. When it just sits there, it acts a top chain guide. So you'll be fine with grip shift for the front derailleur so that you can always whack it in the right spot to run rub-free. Or have the Di2 system do that for you. The reason I quit using the front mech is because I wanted an oval outer ring and these aren't designed for front shifting.
I'm all for removing unsprung weight and putting it near the bottom bracket, but wont be running a front derralier until it is as quiet and has the same chain retention as a single ring.
Maybe it's just special because it reminds of the legendary old GT Zascar hardtail frames? God was I in love with those bikes. Pictures of Hans Rey with his statue of liberty stand on a chrome Zascar come to mind. Couldn't get any better than that.
The Chrome Gt does look good though, Wyns better than Martins lmao!
instead, weve got bright lime greens, pinks, and baby blues....the era of feminizing the man.
www.pinkbike.com/photo/14334614
At least that's what most reviewers and "real riders" were saying a year ago. My, how the tone changes when we start seeing EWS racers running them.
This:
store.ibiscycles.com/arundel-carbon-sideloader-bottle-cage--21oz-bottle-bundle-p333.aspx
Problem is, that thing is 60 clams. I'm personally not that desperate for a water bottle.
Love riding with a bottle for so many reason, but one unexpected side effect Has been that I love buying bottles from local shops in places we visit to ride...give back to a local shop for beta and have a great little useful memory to take back home
In think more than enough frame manufacturers build frames with room for a bottle. But this room created sacrifices how low the frame could be. And this low top tube (or actually the unnamed difference between standover and bb height) is what makes it fun to corner. So it is a compromise. Either have a low top tube, or have room for a bottle. I don't mind bottle-cage-compatible frames being designed and build for those who like them. But I'd hate to see bikes like the Kona Process and the Alutech ICB2.0 disappear just because they don't accept a bottle inside the front triangle.
As for cornering. I'm about 6ft tall (182cm last time I measured, but that was with shoes) and I currently ride a 16" hardtail. When I started out (as an adult), I was advised to get a 19" frame. When I was done with that one (spent too much on replaceable mech hangers, and the dropouts were bent too) I got a steel 18" Voodoo Erzulie. I loved how I could move it underneath me in corners. Felt much more fun, never said it was easier. But more fun, definitely. When I bent that one in a crash (not broken but the head tube must have gotten steeper than a BMX, Joe Murray said it was still good to ride) I got my current steel 16" DMR Switchback. Surely even lower must be even more fun. And I felt it was. Of course low frames from that era (I got the DMR back in 2008 or so but it was already old then) are short too, so that was my compromise. Reach is about 585mm and I'm running a 40mm stem. I'm definitely tempted to invest in a one of these modern frames that is still low but gets me some more length.
That said, of course when you're coasting with the inside pedal up, most of the time the top tube isn't much in the way. Though sometimes (I feel) it is leaning against my calf so apparently I would still enjoy having some more room there. Same with pumptracks. Corners are typically banked so usually you can stay centered. Where it is in the way is when you do have to pedal on a level corner or tight uphill switchback. You want to lean the bike towards the hill so there is the crank you want to have pointing up. Of course ratcheting is going to help but still, a lower top tube there would give more room for a longer stroke. Not sure whether uphill switchbacks are covered in Ryan's Cornering Continuum, still need to look into that one.
But long story short, whether it is easier or not I cannot confirm. But the low top tube feels like more fun and to me, that's what matters.